- Najib Balala retains his tourism portfolio as President Kenyatta announces partial new cabinet
- Pure Zanzibar Ltd trading as Pure Zanzibar, Pure Tanzania and Pure Safari
- Merry Christmas from Atta - December 2017
- South Africa: Day Zero Moves Closer After High Water Usage in Cape Town
- Zambia partners with Ethiopian Airlines to revive national carrier
- Atta Financial Update: 19.12.2017
- Tourism numbers take a hike in Mt Kenya region
- Application for Membership - Nkonzi Camp
- FlyDubai adds Kilimanjaro to its network
- Application for Membership - Audley Travel
Legal SA: Article on Popi Regulations and Role Of Information Officer
POPI – ALARM BELLS OR XMAS BELLS?
We’ve all heard the saying: ‘The future is bright or it is just the lights of an oncoming train’? Likewise with all the alarmist comments about POPI being bandied about of late, I ask myself: are they alarms bells or has Xmas come early?
Let’s be honest, POPI (The Protection of Personal Information Act, Act 4 of 2013) has effectively been around for some 8 years (The Bill was issued in 2009!) so why these sudden noises of Armageddon? What makes it even more perplexing is that not much has changed in terms of content over this period during which a myriad of articles have been written, workshops conducted and there are plenty of videos on ‘You Tube’ .
So let’s get to the point: the regulations were issued for comment recently and based on the content, I believe it is cause for celebration rather an alarm – in fact in terms of POPI Xmas has come early! The reason for this observation is that the regulations spell out the duties of the Information Officer (Referred to in the ‘early days’ as the Information Protection officer) (‘IO’) to be appointed by each entity that is subject to POPI. The bottom line is that the appointee must ensure compliance with POPI by the entity.
Clearly that easier said than done: as the saying goes ‘Doing the right things is easy – the challenge is to know what the right thing is’!! Likewise appointing an IO is easy but the question is: who is the right person? More about that at the end of this article and first I will look at the duties ascribed to the IO (The numbers in brackets are the sections in POPI).
‘Compliance framework’ – this would be the broad canvass incorporating how the entity will meet the 8 conditions prescribed by POPI namely accountability (1): one of which is the appointment of the IO; process limitation (2 & 4); purpose specification (3); information quality (5); openness (6); security safeguards (7) and data subject (i.e. the person to whom the personal information [‘PI’] pertains) and in addition the issues of direct marketing & Spam (69 – 71).
‘Adequate measures’ – this would entail a business plan addressing the compliance strategy (‘lawful processing’) as well as the brand issue i.e. how to deal with any transgressions given the serious nature of especially security breaches –
‘Global hospitality firm Hilton has been ordered to pay a $700,000 penalty for failing to disclose two separate payment card data breaches promptly enough’
Louis the Lawyer